The Anti-Apocalypse of Being

Francis Bacon, Study for the Head of a Screaming Pope (1952)

Themes of alienation, vacuity, and absurdity have permeated the art and literature of the late twentieth century. From Samuel Beckett, to Mark Rothko, Marcel Duchamp, Brett Easton-Ellis, Salvador Dali, and Albert Camus, there appears to be a recognition of something misdirected, misaligned, out of whack. It’s political, social, economic, and even aesthetic – the artists themselves often recognise the futility of even their own art. What has been missing is – naturally – hard to pin down; but there is something essential about it, something epistemic. The resultant failures of society to compensate, despite eager, youthful, soviet-style enthusiastic promises of progress and improvement, merely accelerate the retrenchment of people from the public sphere, from the political, and into the familiar space of the self, and the narcissistic selfie. If this is wrong, if this is not right, or not how it should be, what happened to us?

Hannah Arendt blames the enlightenment, as do many philosophers of the twentieth century. In her work The Human Condition, she points to three aspects to life: labour, our bodily functions; work, our creative efforts; and action, our political exercise. This last element – action – bestows meaning upon the rest of our existence, and she argues that we gave up on that sometime in the seventeenth century. Nietzsche says we missed a trick at the enlightenment. In castigating religious dogma, we didn’t realise that it was dogma that was the problem, rather than religion, and did away with the latter rather than the former. The result was a scientistic dogma that has compounded our alienation ever since, culminating in our neoliberal present. Leo Strauss argued that modernity inevitably leads us to relativism – and by extension scientism, historicism, economism and nihilism. Dany-Robert Dufour calls it The Art of Shrinking Heads, a managerial and scientistic hubris. Juergen Habermas wrote of An Awareness of What is Missing, going further than the Enlightenment, and pushing it all the way back to the Axial Age, the time of Classical Greece around 500BCE, when we saw a divergence between faith and reason. Martin Heidegger, as quoted many times in these pages, lamented the uprooting of man that was well underway by the time of his final interview in 1966.

This grand abdication, a departure from prior convention, appears in retrospect to have been an intuitively sensible course of action, even if its outcome has not been what had been desired. In searching for freedom and human flourishing, western liberalism settled on a lowest common denominator of individual actuation, inadvertently triggering a process of dehumanisation that has appeared to accelerate through the twentieth century. But something else happened.

We have arrived at so exalted a rational position that we believe we have the power to achieve any good thing – that fully knowing the universe is possible, given enough time and resources. The parallel and inevitable development is that we can also achieve any bad thing; and that when bad things happen, it must be because somebody did it, or allowed it to happen, in a positive way. Somebody – some expert, leader, elite or otherwise – made the decision to turn to science rather than religion. Maybe it was Jean-Jacques Rousseau, maybe it was Immanuel Kant. Whoever it was, someone did it. It could have been a group of people. But it was people who did it, positively, through their actions, decisions, and agency. Fast forward to today and the debate on Climate Change. Once again, we have an absolute conviction that human beings did this, that people decided ‘we’re going to burn coal and oil’ and deliberately construct a global economy that drives global warming. Similarly, we have an absolute conviction that if certain people, or groups of people, such as companies, decided to do so in the morning, Climate Change could at least be slowed down. This anthropocentrism is a symptom of that great abdication, when we lost the balance in our cosmology, an ontological turn, when (as Habermas might have put it) something went missing.

The toxic combination of historicism and economism has reduced us; we are less than we were before. Progress is a myth. For all our smartphones and drugs and machines, we have regressed as sentient ontological beings and become teleologically impoverished, having traded eschatology for nihilism towards a kind of anti-apocalypse: this is no revealing, no final judgement, no end of history; it is an annihilation.

10 thoughts on “The Anti-Apocalypse of Being”

  1. I’m persuaded by Julian Jaynes’ argument. The sense of something loss, something having gone wrong began in the decline and collapse of Bronze Age civilization. In the dark ages that followed, there was widespread lament of God having gone silent. Something appears to have fundamentally changed in the human psyche.

    This created the conditions for the Axial Age. And history since has been the further development of those changes. It feels like something new has happened with modernity because we are coming to an extreme point. But the essential complaints we here today were already articulated in the ancient world.

    1. It’s funny, I was just reading about Augustine’s early complaints about the dogmatism of the Catholic orthodoxy in the fourth century, and it seemed the language could just as easily have come from the twentieth century. Many of these arguments are not new, it’s just the context has changed. Thanks for commenting – I’ll look up Julian Jaynes, I’d not heard of him.

      1. His book, now a classic, is almost a half century old. As an introduction to his work, I might instead recommend reading one of the collections of Jaynesian scholarship written by others, as these are more recent. But if you don’t mind reading older scholarship, Jaynes is in good company as others like Walter Ong, Eric Havelock, and Bruno Snell made similar arguments about a major change in the human psyche.

      2. That is a major focus of mine. I can’t help but see how the basic form of arguments and complaints remains so similar even as the context shifts, whether on is looking over centuries or millennia. Even something that feels so recent like the culture wars have begin going on for a long time, such as the issue of abortion prior to the American Civil War. Humanity has such a short memory. We keep repeating the same old conflicts without ever resolving them and each time we act like it has never happened before. It’s mass repetition-compulsion.

      3. Technology changes things though, doesn’t it? Abortion pre-US Civil War would have been a pretty brutal, urban issue, unconsidered by most as a reasonable step to take. Ease of access – relatively speaking – must have an impact on the argument. One thing I have been recently curious about is the second amendment debate, how it seems entrenched, but wasn’t really an issue as recently as the 1980s. I wonder whether it had something to do with how expensive / inaccessible guns were.

      4. I actually don’t know that abortion was all that bad in the early 19th century. Invasive procedures weren’t necessary, as humans have known about herbal abortifacients for millennia. Anyway, at the time, one in four or five pregnancies ended in abortion. It must not have been too horrific that so many women sought it out.

        Even though it became an issue in the 19th century, as with guns, it didn’t become a potent political football until the culture wars of the 1980s and 1990s. There were abortion laws before that, but most Christians had no issue with the practice. Even the laws weren’t usually enforced. My great grandfather was a rural doctor who did abortions, even though technically abortions were illegal in Indiana at the time.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s